[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16650488#comment-16650488
]
Kevin Risden edited comment on KNOX-1525 at 10/15/18 5:18 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
h2. Results
50 thousand rows
* HBase shell - ~11.0 seconds
* HBase Rest- ~1.6 seconds
* HBase Rest with Knox - ~ seconds
100 thousand rows
* HBase shell - ~13.9 seconds
* HBase Rest- ~3.4 seconds
* HBase Rest with Knox - ~ seconds
200 thousand rows
* HBase shell - ~19.7 seconds
* HBase Rest- ~5.3 seconds
* HBase Rest with Knox - ~ seconds
was (Author: risdenk):
h2. Results
50 thousand rows
* HBase shell - ~11.0 seconds
* HBase Rest- ~ seconds
* HBase Rest with Knox - ~ seconds
100 thousand rows
* HBase shell - ~13.9 seconds
* HBase Rest- ~ seconds
* HBase Rest with Knox - ~ seconds
200 thousand rows
* HBase shell - ~19.7 seconds
* HBase Rest- ~ seconds
* HBase Rest with Knox - ~ seconds
> HBase "scan" performance evaluation
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-1525
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1525
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Kevin Risden
> Assignee: Kevin Risden
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> While looking at WebHDFS performance in KNOX-1221, I decided to look a bit
> more into performance for common use cases. HBase performance is another area
> that could use some research.
> Use "scan limit" to get a comparison of raw return speed from HBase Rest.
> This should show how fast results can be streamed through HBase Rest and
> Knox. Compare the results to "hbase shell" since this will render the data
> directly from HBase through the typical HBase shell. This should give
> comparisons for the difference in overhead between HBase, HBase Rest and
> HBase Rest with Knox.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
