[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17412407#comment-17412407
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on KNOX-2658:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 486abb0c3ad1d9ad6d3deb1af2dbe73da1968970 in knox's branch 
refs/heads/master from Sandor Molnar
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=knox.git;h=486abb0 ]

KNOX-2658 - Skipping in-memory lookup while fetching expiration/metadata for a 
token (#490)



> JDBCTokenStateService is not HA-compatible
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KNOX-2658
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2658
>             Project: Apache Knox
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Server
>            Reporter: Sandor Molnar
>            Assignee: Sandor Molnar
>            Priority: Critical
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In case of Knox HA deployments, the JDBC token state service cannot guarantee 
> that expiration time and metadata-related information (e.g. the enabled flag) 
> is up-to-date.
> For instance:
>  # a token is created on node 1 -> the in-memory storage in 
> DefaultTokenStateService will have all information and the DB will also 
> contain everything properly
>  # the token is used on node 2 for authentication purposes -> since token 
> metadata is not yet available in-memory thenĀ first we'll look-up the missing 
> piece of information in the DB and then update the in-memory cache in 
> DefaultTokenStateService
>  # the token disable request arrives on node 1 -> the in-memory storage in 
> DefaultTokenStateService will be updated and the DB will also contain 
> everything properly. Please note, at this time the token is disabled
>  # the token is used on node 2 for authentication purposes -> since theĀ 
> in-memory cache already has metadata information about this token, the DB 
> will not be checked -> the token is considered enabled
> I did research and found out that we could use PostgreSQL's 
> [NOTIFY|https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/sql-notify.html] and 
> [LISTEN|https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/sql-listen.html] mechanism to 
> implement the observer pattern on our end. Unfortunately, this only works for 
> Postgres.
> Instead of going down that way, I'd make the JDBC token state service DB 
> vendor-independent by skipping the in-memory lookup for data that can be 
> changed:
>  * expiration time
>  * metadata
> We may have to think about adding connection pooling as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to