[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2631?focusedWorklogId=814091&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-814091
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on KNOX-2631:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 05/Oct/22 20:06
            Start Date: 05/Oct/22 20:06
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: moresandeep commented on code in PR #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/639#discussion_r985869754


##########
pom.xml:
##########
@@ -280,7 +284,13 @@
         <xml-matchers.version>0.10</xml-matchers.version>
         <zookeeper.version>3.5.7</zookeeper.version>
     </properties>
-
+    <repositories>
+        <repository>
+            <id>jcenter</id>

Review Comment:
   This is for pty4j. Interestingly, [Pty4j was not part of maven central until 
Nov 2021 ](https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jetbrains.pty4j/pty4j)(when 
this was introduced). I can now see [Pty4j in maven central 
](https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jetbrains.pty4j/pty4j) 
   
   I'll use the new version of Pty4j from maven central and see if it works.
   Thank you soo much for catching this!



##########
pom.xml:
##########
@@ -248,13 +249,16 @@
         <mina.version>2.0.22</mina.version>
         <netty.version>4.1.77.Final</netty.version>
         <nimbus-jose-jwt.version>8.14.1</nimbus-jose-jwt.version>
-        <nodejs.version>v12.18.2</nodejs.version>
+        <nodejs.version>v12.20.2</nodejs.version>
         <okhttp.version>2.7.5</okhttp.version>
         <opensaml.version>3.4.5</opensaml.version>
         <pac4j.version>4.5.6</pac4j.version>
         <postgresql.version>42.3.3</postgresql.version>
         <mysql.version>8.0.28</mysql.version>
         <protobuf.version>3.16.1</protobuf.version>
+        <powermock.version>2.0.9</powermock.version>
+        <purejavacomm.version>0.0.11.1</purejavacomm.version>
+        <pty4j.version>0.11.4</pty4j.version>

Review Comment:
   Thanks, I thought I had checked the license. Let me add those entries.



##########
pom.xml:
##########
@@ -248,13 +249,16 @@
         <mina.version>2.0.22</mina.version>
         <netty.version>4.1.77.Final</netty.version>
         <nimbus-jose-jwt.version>8.14.1</nimbus-jose-jwt.version>
-        <nodejs.version>v12.18.2</nodejs.version>
+        <nodejs.version>v12.20.2</nodejs.version>
         <okhttp.version>2.7.5</okhttp.version>
         <opensaml.version>3.4.5</opensaml.version>
         <pac4j.version>4.5.6</pac4j.version>
         <postgresql.version>42.3.3</postgresql.version>
         <mysql.version>8.0.28</mysql.version>
         <protobuf.version>3.16.1</protobuf.version>
+        <powermock.version>2.0.9</powermock.version>
+        <purejavacomm.version>0.0.11.1</purejavacomm.version>
+        <pty4j.version>0.11.4</pty4j.version>

Review Comment:
   So, we already have Eclipse license for Jetty, I just added Pty4j to the 
list using that license (without duplicating the entire license text)



##########
gateway-server/src/test/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/websockets/GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.knox.gateway.websockets;
+
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.api.AuditService;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.api.AuditServiceFactory;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.api.Auditor;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.config.GatewayConfig;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.i18n.GatewaySpiMessages;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.i18n.messages.MessagesFactory;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.provider.federation.jwt.JWTMessages;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.services.GatewayServices;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.webshell.WebshellWebSocketAdapter;
+import org.easymock.EasyMock;
+import org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.servlet.ServletUpgradeRequest;
+import org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.servlet.ServletUpgradeResponse;
+import org.junit.Assert;
+import org.junit.BeforeClass;
+import org.junit.Rule;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.rules.ExpectedException;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock;
+import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
+import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;
+
+import java.net.URI;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
+
+import static org.easymock.EasyMock.isA;
+
+@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
+@PrepareForTest({JWTValidatorFactory.class, MessagesFactory.class, 
GatewayWebsocketHandler.class, AuditServiceFactory.class})
+public class GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest {
+    @BeforeClass
+    public static void setUpBeforeClass() throws Exception {
+        // setup MessageFactory for static variable
+        PowerMock.mockStatic(MessagesFactory.class);

Review Comment:
   This was a frustrating exercise :( we have MessagesFactory referenced in 
statically which was causing tests to blow up (NPEs)



##########
gateway-server/src/test/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/websockets/GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.knox.gateway.websockets;
+
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.api.AuditService;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.api.AuditServiceFactory;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.api.Auditor;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.config.GatewayConfig;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.i18n.GatewaySpiMessages;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.i18n.messages.MessagesFactory;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.provider.federation.jwt.JWTMessages;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.services.GatewayServices;
+import org.apache.knox.gateway.webshell.WebshellWebSocketAdapter;
+import org.easymock.EasyMock;
+import org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.servlet.ServletUpgradeRequest;
+import org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.servlet.ServletUpgradeResponse;
+import org.junit.Assert;
+import org.junit.BeforeClass;
+import org.junit.Rule;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.rules.ExpectedException;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock;
+import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
+import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;
+
+import java.net.URI;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
+
+import static org.easymock.EasyMock.isA;
+
+@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
+@PrepareForTest({JWTValidatorFactory.class, MessagesFactory.class, 
GatewayWebsocketHandler.class, AuditServiceFactory.class})
+public class GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest {
+    @BeforeClass
+    public static void setUpBeforeClass() throws Exception {
+        // setup MessageFactory for static variable
+        PowerMock.mockStatic(MessagesFactory.class);
+        
EasyMock.expect(MessagesFactory.get(GatewaySpiMessages.class)).andReturn(EasyMock.createNiceMock(GatewaySpiMessages.class)).anyTimes();
+        
EasyMock.expect(MessagesFactory.get(JWTMessages.class)).andReturn(EasyMock.createNiceMock(JWTMessages.class)).anyTimes();
+        
EasyMock.expect(MessagesFactory.get(WebsocketLogMessages.class)).andReturn(EasyMock.createNiceMock(WebsocketLogMessages.class)).anyTimes();
+        PowerMock.replay(MessagesFactory.class);
+        // setup Auditor for static variable
+        PowerMock.mockStatic(AuditServiceFactory.class);

Review Comment:
   Same as above.





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 814091)
    Time Spent: 6h 40m  (was: 6.5h)

> KnoxSSO for Secure Shell Access
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KNOX-2631
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2631
>             Project: Apache Knox
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Homepage, KnoxSSO
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Lu Liu
>            Assignee: Lu Liu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 6h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While Apache Knox aids in helping to lessen the need to gain physical access
> to deployment machines, there are still numerous compelling reasons for users
> to require such access:
> 1. Debugging, log access, etc
> 2. CLI use and automation
> 3. beeline and other clients that are deployed to gateway machines
> Gaining access to a shell for these purposes currently requires the user to 
> have
> an ssh client installed and valid credentials that can be used for ssh, such 
> as:
> username and password or SSH keys. Separate management of credentials for this
> access introduces some additional complexities which may even violate 
> enterprise
> infosec policies and require the secure distribution and management of keys.
> The intent of this proposed improvement is to add a browser based terminal 
> application
> that will provide secure access to a shell on the Knox machine. Just as any 
> resource
> exposed by or hosted by Knox, you would be able to protect access to this 
> terminal
> with any of the available security providers. We would also like to make this
> available out of the box as available from the Knox Homepage. This would make 
> the
> terminal/shell available via KnoxSSO thus providing shell access with your 
> existing
> enterprise credential authenticated SSO session.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to