lmccay commented on code in PR #900:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/900#discussion_r1564243026
##########
gateway-service-knoxtoken/src/main/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/service/knoxtoken/TokenResource.java:
##########
@@ -626,14 +628,14 @@ public Response revoke(String token) {
final String tokenId = getTokenId(token);
if (isKnoxSsoCookie(tokenId)) {
errorStatus = Response.Status.FORBIDDEN;
- error = "SSO cookie (" + Tokens.getTokenIDDisplayText(tokenId) + ")
cannot not be revoked." ;
+ error = "SSO cookie (" + Tokens.getTokenIDDisplayText(tokenId) + ")
cannot not be revoked.";
errorCode = ErrorCode.UNAUTHORIZED;
} else if (triesToRevokeOwnToken(tokenId, revoker) ||
allowedRenewers.contains(revoker)) {
tokenStateService.revokeToken(tokenId);
log.revokedToken(getTopologyName(),
- Tokens.getTokenDisplayText(token),
- Tokens.getTokenIDDisplayText(tokenId),
- revoker);
+ Tokens.getTokenDisplayText(token),
Review Comment:
Not sure why it was the previous indentation. I guess someone is lining up
the dots? That is not a convention that is standard. That said, I don't know
why this was changed at all. Likely some IDE shenanigans related to my
migration to a new dev machine. These are all in the same method and I am
working backwards through them. I ilke how the code reads with this formatting.
If you can look at the code in context and think I should revert the changes
then I will. We should also add to the checkstyle rules if that is the case
though.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@knox.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
