pzampino commented on code in PR #929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/929#discussion_r1725038551
##########
gateway-server/src/main/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/GatewayServer.java:
##########
@@ -962,10 +985,32 @@ private void processApplicationPathAliases(File warDir,
Topology topology) {
});
}
+ private void addInactiveTopology(final String topologyName) {
+ synchronized (inactiveTopologies) {
+ inactiveTopologies.add(topologyName);
+ }
+ }
+
+ private void removeInactiveTopology(final String topologyName) {
+ synchronized (inactiveTopologies) {
+ inactiveTopologies.remove(topologyName);
+ }
+ }
+
+ private boolean isInactiveTopology(final String topologyName) {
+ boolean result = false;
+ synchronized (inactiveTopologies) {
+ result = inactiveTopologies.contains(topologyName);
+ }
+ return result;
+ }
+
private synchronized void internalDeactivateTopology( Topology topology ) {
Review Comment:
Concerning the point about initial deployments, we could/should immediately
mark topologies as inactive on deployment initiation, and then mark them as
active upon completion. I believe this would further minimize the potential for
clients to receive a 404 response for a "deployed" topology.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@knox.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
