[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3199?focusedWorklogId=991706&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-991706
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on KNOX-3199:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 14/Nov/25 12:46
            Start Date: 14/Nov/25 12:46
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: hanicz opened a new pull request, #1105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/1105

   [KNOX-3199](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3199) - Topology 
level async support
   
   ## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   Adds a new gateway-site.xml configuration that makes it possible to only 
enable async support for specific topologies.
   
   `gateway.servlet.async.supported.topologies`: Comma separated list of 
topologies that support async.
   
   ```
   <property>
       <name>gateway.servlet.async.supported.topologies</name>
       <value>health,sandbox</value>
   </property>
   ```
   
   The new config takes precedence over a false 
`gateway.servlet.async.supported`. So even if async support is turned off on 
gateway level the new config makes it possible to turn it on for specific 
topologies.
   
   ## How was this patch tested?
   
   Unit tests, manually tested locally with SSE service
   
   




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 991706)
    Remaining Estimate: 0h
            Time Spent: 10m

> Topology level async support
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: KNOX-3199
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3199
>             Project: Apache Knox
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Server
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Tamás Hanicz
>            Assignee: Tamás Hanicz
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the only way to turn on async support is with a gateway level 
> config. It would be beneficial to make the configuration topology level as 
> well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to