[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18111158#comment-18111158
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on KNOX-3433:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 6f94600951397379670ab5aa30d15a5f2f51a6c2 in knox's branch
refs/heads/master from Sandor Molnar
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=knox.git;h=6f9460095 ]
KNOX-3433: set issued_token_type in KnoxIDF token responses (RFC 8693 §2.2.1)
(#1375)
> knoxidf token exchange response must include issued_token_type
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-3433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3433
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: JWT
> Reporter: Harrison Sheinblatt
> Assignee: Sandor Molnar
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> RFC 8693 §2.2.1 requires the response include issued_token_type
> It's not set now by knoxidf.
> The correct value to set is "urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt". While
> access_token may be OK in some circumstances, since we're returning a jwt
> that is meant to be used as a jwt for possible future exchanges and authz, so
> the client might parse it to get, for example, group claims, jwt is correct
> here.
> Note that OAuthResource does set the field in the response, but hardcodes it
> to access_token and has different logic than the base knoxtoken
> TokenResource, so it's unclear we want to inherit from that and refactor it
> to allow the jwt value.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)