ACK, sounds good.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 19, 2013 2:17 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox (Incubator) 0.2.0

>Hey Chris,
>Yep did that already.  I'm still trying to work the kinks out with
>pushing to the mirrors though so we can't [ANNOUNCE].
>Kevin.
>
>On 4/19/13 5:14 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
>> Hey Kevin,
>>
>> Sorry it took me so long to reply on this. If you just send the
>> [RESULT] [VOTE] from knox-dev@ to general@incubator as a Fwd,
>> and they say you will wait 72 hrs for lazy consensus, you're good.
>>
>> You probably already did that and I'll see later when I catch up
>> on my email but in case you were still waiting there you are.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
>><[email protected]>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 5:27 AM
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox (Incubator) 0.2.0
>>
>>> Chris,
>>> What form does the general@incubator notification usually take. I've
>>> searched around but I don't really see a pattern.  Should I have just
>>> included general@incubator in the [RESULT][VOTE] email? Also, how do I
>>> ensure that it gets some legal review of the LICENSE and NOTICE files
>>>in
>>> particular?
>>> Kevin.
>>>
>>> On 4/3/13 1:39 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
>>>> You're totally allowed to VOTE!
>>>>
>>>> I'm totally swamped right now, BTW :)
>>>>
>>>> Hope to review this before the end of the week.
>>>>
>>>> Kevin, once you have 3 IPMC members here that have responded
>>>> with +1s you can technically call the VOTE done, and send
>>>> to general@incubator just to let them know (and leave open
>>>> for lazy consensus 72 hours then after that wrap the VOTE).
>>>> If we don't get 3 IPMC members here on dev@knox to respond,
>>>> then we need to go to general@incubator regardless to look
>>>> for 3-(# of IPMC members who have voted on dex@knox) VOTEs.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 7:39 AM
>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox (Incubator) 0.2.0
>>>>
>>>>> Note sure if I'm allowed to vote but...
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I verified hashes and signatures
>>>>> 2. Performed manual sanity testing and ran a few samples.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 (if I'm allowed as the RM)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/3/13 8:16 AM, larry mccay wrote:
>>>>>> Signature verified - I assume that the fact that the key is
>>>>>>untrusted
>>>>>> as of
>>>>>> yet is okay.
>>>>>> Manual testing seems fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Kevin Minder
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A candidate for the Apache Knox (Incubator) 0.2.0 release is
>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>http://people.apache.org/~**kminder/knox/0.2.0/<http://people.apache
>>>>>>>.o
>>>>>>> rg
>>>>>>> /~kminder/knox/0.2.0/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-knox.git<https:/
>>>>>>>/g
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> -wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-knox.git>
>>>>>>> Branch 0.2.0 (git checkout -b v0.2.0)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The SHA1 checksum of the source archive is
>>>>>>> 73a6b5282ba32c3fbce330158861fd*
>>>>>>> *0c04e5a992.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox (Incubator)
>>>>>>> 0.2.0.
>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>>>>>>>at
>>>>>>> least three +1 Apache Knox (Incubator) PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox (Incubator) 0.2.0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to