One thing I want to point out is that we currently have the docs and the code in different repositories. I don't know if there are different commit bits for each.
Code = https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-knox.git
Docs = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/knox

On 9/26/13 9:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
Some projects- httpd notably- have extended a commit bit to
contributors who only wrote documentation, trusting that they would
use it responsibly. They said it worked well. It wasn't a ceiling on
the committer's role, but they knew to ping people before pushing
changes to some parts of the tree.

I haven't been on a project that generated enough documentation for
that particular role, but testing/build engineers on Hadoop have been
given a commit bit in the past. The result was more mixed there, but
positive overall. Same process. -C

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Kevin Minder
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hey Everyone,

My recent change to move most of the release specific docs from wiki to svn
is likely to create a bottleneck for us.  The one thing that I really liked
about using the wiki was that it had a very low barrier to entry for anyone
interested in working with docs. Specifically we have direct control over
the wiki permissions so it is very easy to grant privs.  Now this being said
we have been fairly free (possible too free) in granting those privs.
Having these docs in svn will require commit privs in that repo for release
doc updates.

So my question is do we want to distinguish between a code and doc
committer?  If not, what should the process be for making someone a doc
committer?  Does it have to be a formal as it is for code committers?

Kevin.

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it
from your system. Thank You.


--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to