May be, as a workaround we could run our mini_kdc only on at 127.0.0.1
address.


Best regards,

Alexey

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> FWIW it looks like there's already some code out there that can do the
> appropriate "fake DNS" wrapping: https://cwrap.org/nss_wrapper.html
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks
> >
> > I've been looking into why our kerberos-dependent tests are failing on
> el6
> > and it looks like it will be unfortunately difficult to fix.
> >
> > The first issue was that krb5 1.10 (on el6) doesn't automatically create
> > the directory for a DIR:<path> type ticket cache. That one was easy to
> fix
> > and got minikdc-test passing.
> >
> > The more insidious issue, though, is the following:
> > In miniclusters we start daemons on weird local IP addresses (127.x.y.z)
> > which don't have any corresponding domain names. So, we have configured
> the
> > MiniKDC to disable reverse DNS, and are creating service principals kudu/
> > 127.x....@krbtest.com. This works great on krb5-1.12.
> >
> > However, there's a bug in krb5 1.10 (http://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/
> > Ticket/Display.html?id=7603) which is preventing this from working on
> > el6. When 'rdns = false', Kerberos is unable to figure out which realm
> the
> > server is in (and doesn't fall back to the default realm). So, our
> > connections are failing with: "Cannot determine realm for numeric host
> > address".
> >
> > If we change to 'rdns = true', then it will first try to reverse lookup
> > the weird loopback, and then when it fails, still give the same error
> about
> > numeric hosts.
> >
> > It's possible there's some way to explicitly set the target realm, but if
> > so I can't seem to find it. So, the only workarounds I can think of are:
> >
> > 1) Use a local build of krb5 1.12 or later on el6 for test purposes. I
> > verified that if I built krb5 1.14 and put its libraries in
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and modified MiniKDC to use corresponding binaries, the
> > tests passed fine.
> >
> > The downside here is that we would lose test coverage of the library
> > version actually installed on a lot of end-user systems. So another
> option
> > might be to test against a patched version of 1.10 (with only the fix for
> > this numeric hostname issue).
> >
> > 2) Somehow monkey-patch getnameinfo() to provide reverse DNS entries for
> > 127.x.y.z mapping to '127-x-y-z.kudu.local' or something of that nature.
> > We'd have to do this via LD_PRELOAD probably, which is a bummer, but I
> > can't see any other way to override the resolver on a per-user basis
> > ($HOSTALIASES only does forward DNS).
> >
> > Any other ideas?
> >
> > -Todd
> > --
> > Todd Lipcon
> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Reply via email to