Perhaps we can keep voting on this release, finish up the release notes
today, and have a quick turnaround on rc2? I imagine if the diff between
the tags is only in the docs/ directory, we can get the voting done in a
couple hours (just verify the sha/signature, no need to rebuild and retest
if the code is identical)

-Todd

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Just planning on pushing them to the website when 0.7.1 is available..
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Or maybe what you're saying is that you're already planning for an RC2.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm a little confused about this. So you're saying that we won't
> include
> > > release notes in the source artifact for the release? That seems pretty
> > > atypical.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yeah was planning on casually doing that. My gripe with release notes
> is
> > >> that they take time to write and review, delaying an RC by days if we
> > were
> > >> to wait for them to be written before releasing it.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Should we edit docs/release_notes.adoc to include release notes for
> > >> 0.7.1
> > >> > before releasing? It seems odd that the release wouldn't mention the
> > >> latest
> > >> > version in the included release notes.
> > >> >
> > >> > -Todd
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <
> > [email protected]
> > >> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We're happy to announce the first release candidate for Apache
> Kudu
> > >> > > (incubating) 0.7.1.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This release fixes a few important bugs found during the process
> of
> > >> > > releasing 0.7.0 that didn't warrant sinking the vote for. It also
> > >> takes
> > >> > > care of fixing some licenses.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The is a source-only release. The artifacts were staged here:
> > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kudu/0.7.1-RC1/
> > >> > >
> > >> > > It was built from this tag:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-kudu.git;a=commit;h=bd191ec7366e13c3a11c6144f3b5af03d6496b38
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The list of all issues fixed can be found here:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KUDU%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.7.1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > KEYS file:
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/kudu/KEYS
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'd suggest going through the README, building Kudu, and running
> the
> > >> unit
> > >> > > tests.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please try the release and vote; vote will be open for at least 72
> > >> hours.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > J-D
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Todd Lipcon
> > >> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Reply via email to