I discovered a couple bad issues over the weekend that I think we should
prioritize to get in for 0.8:

- KUDU-1379 - this is a regression blocker where column range predicates on
float/double/bool columns no longer work. We should either fix this or
revert the predicate changes that Dan committed last week (preferably just
fix it, since I dont think it's too hard)
- KUDU-1380 - this is not a regression but it's a case where we can get
silently wrong results (duplicated rows) from the C++ scanner. Since it's a
correctness issue I marked it as blocker. Does anyone have time to look at
this today/tomorrow? If not I will try to take a look.

-Todd

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I just went through the Blocker and Critical jiras targeted for 0.8.0 and
> moved a bunch that I knew wouldn't get done in time. Once I branch I'll
> bulk move the rest. In most cases it's fine to bring them back into 0.8.0,
> as long as it can be done by midweek next week. In doubt, poke me in the
> jira.
>
> J-D
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey devs,
> >
> > It's almost time for 0.8.0, I'd like to get a first RC out in a week on
> > April 1st (but more realistically it might happen the 4th). I will create
> > the branch on March 30th.
> >
> > The release note-worthy items that have been committed since 0.7.0 that
> > aren't in 0.7.1:
> >  - RPC and application feature flags
> >  - KUDU-1337 Avoid spurious remote bootstraps on DeleteTablet()
> >  - Fixed the Spark shutdown bug
> >  - KUDU-1322 failover writes on tablet not found in the C++ client
> >  - KUDU-969. Fix handling of crashes just before tablet metadata flush
> >  - KUDU-1354. Writes should not release locks before committing MVCC
> >  - master: don't expose intermediate CreateTable() state to consumers
> >
> > The things that are still in flight that I really want to get in:
> >  - Partition pruning in the C++ client and improvements on the
> > server-side. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2413/
> >  - [java-client] implement ColumnPredicate API
> > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2591/
> >  - KUDU-1235. Add Get API http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2519/
> >
> > Anything else that comes in is gravy, but I think the scan token API
> > integration in the Java client needs more thinking. I think Dan is
> supposed
> > to send an email to dev@ about it.
> >
> > What do you devs think?
> >
> > J-D
> >
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Reply via email to