Stack, Mind porting your vote over to the general@ thread since this one is already closed?
Thanks, J-D On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep. 10.11.13. Let me go add to the issue. Thanks Todd and Misty. > St.Ack > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Misty Stanley-Jones < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Could that be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1394 ? > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding, mentor) > > > > > > > > + Checked sig and hash > > > > + Ran build on macox. Ran nice and smooth. > > > > + Ran unit tests. Below failed for me. Others passed. > > > > > > > > Start 40: pstack_watcher-test > > > > 40/184 Test #40: pstack_watcher-test ...............***Failed > 0.62 > > > sec > > > > > > > > > > Just to note that test failure list was more than just one: > > > > > > 95% tests passed, 9 tests failed out of 184 > > > > > > Label Time Summary: > > > no_dist_test = 21.99 sec (1 test) > > > no_tsan = 9.23 sec (3 tests) > > > > > > Total Test time (real) = 1104.30 sec > > > > > > The following tests FAILED: > > > 40 - pstack_watcher-test (Failed) > > > 154 - client-test (Failed) > > > 163 - raft_consensus-itest (Failed) > > > 165 - ts_recovery-itest (Failed) > > > 167 - delete_table-test (Failed) > > > 169 - linked_list-test (Failed) > > > 170 - all_types-itest (Failed) > > > 172 - tablet_replacement-itest (Failed) > > > 173 - create-table-itest (Failed) > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > + Ran rat on java subdir > > > > + Poked around the layout; looks good. > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> The vote is now closed. It passes with: > > > >> > > > >> 4 binding +1s: Dan B, Misty SJ, J-D C, Mike P > > > >> > > > >> 0 -1s of any nature. > > > >> > > > >> I will now be taking this up to the IPMC on the general@ list. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> > > > >> J-D > > > >> > > > >> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> > We're happy to announce the first release candidate for Apache > Kudu > > > >> > (incubating) 0.8.0. > > > >> > > > > >> > We are doing time-based releases leading up to 1.0.0 towards the > end > > > of > > > >> > the summer, with one 0.x.0 release every two months. > > > >> > > > > >> > The is a source-only release. The artifacts were staged here: > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kudu/0.8.0-RC1/ > > > >> > > > > >> > It was built from this tag: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-kudu.git;a=commit;h=7874185b07198267229c1cc921b21549ea16cf53 > > > >> > > > > >> > The release notes can be found here: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kudu/blob/master/docs/release_notes.adoc#rn_0.8.0 > > > >> > > > > >> > KEYS file: > > > >> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/kudu/KEYS > > > >> > > > > >> > I'd suggest going through the README, building Kudu, and running > the > > > >> unit > > > >> > tests. > > > >> > > > > >> > Please try the release and vote; vote will be open for at least 72 > > > >> hours. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > >> > J-D > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
