JD, this seems reasonable to me. Mike
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Dan Burkert <d...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Sounds good to me, I like the idea of having a bit more time to shake any > last bugs out before the big release. > > - Dan > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hey devs, > > > > 5 months ago I wrote up this plan[1] about release cadence and 1.0, and > > we've been sticking pretty close to it. After 0.9.0 I bumped up the > version > > to 1.0.0 assuming it'd be the next release, but on second thought this > > might have been a mistake since it doesn't allow for any other > intermediate > > release. > > > > What's prompting this is that we're still ingesting a lot of new code > with > > many more patches up for review. We've been good up to this point at > > delivering new features early and often, so I wouldn't want to block that > > while we stabilize 1.0. > > > > The plan I'm suggesting: > > - Release 0.10.0 in early August, which follows our "one major version > > release every two months" cadence. > > - Wait a few weeks for the new bits to be exercised then release 1.0 in > > September. > > > > In essence, 0.10.0 would act like a "1.0.0-preview" but I'd rather not > set > > a precedent here. > > > > If there are no objections, I'll proceed with the version change soon. > > > > Cheers, > > > > J-D > > > > 1. > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kudu-dev/201602.mbox/%3ccagptdncmbwwx8p+ygkzhfl2xcmktscu-rhlcqfsns1uvsbr...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > >
