I opened a new jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-1379 to track this, and I will work on this in Feb.
> 在 2016年1月29日，03:33，Li Yang <liy...@apache.org> 写道： > > 2.x failed because it started to do the right thing -- allocate enough mem > for a row -- while 1.x just hard coded 1mb for the row buffer. > > I dont think the max length is too much an issue previously cause the goal > was to get the feature in. Now it is time to fix details like this. Adding > precision is a good idea.
