In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pavel Janík) wrote:
> > As you know, I'm always waiting for cws to be integrated for my > > FreeBSD patches :) > > This is different thing. This is only because you are lazy or do not have > time to learn cws tooling ;-)) You can (once you know cws tools) do that > yourself and ask me to QA that CVS. And this *could* be fast. No, I'm not talking about it. This process is transparent. raise an issue, attach a patch, assigned to someone (thank you, Pavel). I can see CVS log at bonsai who, when, how patches are committed to some cws and status of cws at EIS. cws announce ML tells us what tag is ready atm, what cwses are created, nominated etc. Transparent. However, translation process is still unclear, as we know. (A part of) my motivation towards OOo is porting to FreeBSD. This is my pleasure to see our patches, any kind of efforts are integrated to main trunk. I can confirm every part of the process. BTW: I'm happy to hear from you that I can ask you about QA :) and thank you for explanations! I learned a lot from you again! -- NAKATA, Maho --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
