Thanks for your reply, Eike. :) On 08/12/2006, at 2:52 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
[... genitive date forms (posessive context) ...]Does strftime handle this issue?AFAIK no implementation of strftime() does.if not, it would be worth-while passing the information on to that project as well, since it is so widely-used for time/date formatting. If you supply the specific info for Slavic languages, I'll chase up strftime if you like. :)Note that, depending on platform and environment, strftime() may implement an ISO C9x standard and may follow a POSIX (.1 or .2)standard, plus some extensions on selected platforms. It might be a bitproblematic to "chase up _the_ strftime project" ;-)
Yes, it's not one thing in one place. But it's still quite possible to feed progress on strftime. ;)
For OOo I don't care, we don't use strftime for display formatting purposes.
I think it's important to see outside OOo as well. strftime is widely used in other software, so if we create resources here that it can use, I for one am willing to try and pass them on. Inter-project cooperation can be very fruitful. :)
from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
