fyva wrote:
03.06.2010 08:16, Serg Bormant пишет:
2010/6/2 fyva<mene...@bk.ru>:
Hi all,
Please, can anyone with enough rights at qatracks approve these
builds for
Russian (http://tiny.cc/iefw1)? Our issue is
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111978 .
MacOS_x86
http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/extended/3.2.1rc2/OOo_3.2.1rc2_20100521_MacOS_x86_install_ru.dmg
http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/extended/3.2.1rc2/OOo_3.2.1rc2_20100521_MacOS_x86_langpack_ru.dmg
Are these correct? Why about 20100527 builds instead of 20100521?
http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/macosx86/3.2.1rc2_20100527/OOo_3.2.1rc2_20100527_MacOS_x86_install_ru.dmg
http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/macosx86/3.2.1rc2_20100527/OOo_3.2.1rc2_20100527_MacOS_x86_langpack_ru.dmg
ja says that the build from May 21st includes a bitmap that should
not be there...
yes, the wrong bitmap was the last stopper. Therefore Maho had to
rebuild all Mac builds and the files from 20100527 are the files that
should be tested for release.
I am not sure May 27th builds were tested, no-one says what exactly RC2
they test, but I assume it is May 21st, because those builds are on the
official RC download page. Let's approve May 27th builds, in case of
issues we can replace them by May 21st builds.
Please forget the Mac builds from 20100521. ;-)
Best regards
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l10n.openoffice.org
