+1. It would be a good move.

Regards,
Deepak Kumar Barr
Bigfoot-Apps

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Ankeet Maini <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 to PRs!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Ajay Yadav" <[email protected]>
> Sent: ‎25-‎01-‎2016 12:21 AM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Github pull Request model
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> On popular demand Apache provided integration with github pull requests and
> several Apache projects (the cool kids on the block like SPARK, Kafka,
> Flink etc.) have moved to github's pull request model instead of the patch
> and reviewboard approach and more are moving towards that approach (Apache
> Falcon etc.).  Some of the advantages of this approach are as follows
>
>    1. *Familiarity* *-* Due to the popularity of github in open source
>    projects lot more users are familiar with the pull request model than
>    the patch/ review board based approach.
>    2. *Ease - *Users don't have to create a review board request and at the
>    same time attach the patch to JIRA also. Although lens has some
> automation,
>    it still requires learning a new tool for contributors.
>    3. *Conflicts and Test Status - *Users get a real time visibility in
>    whether their request can be merged cleanly and the status of tests if
>    their changes are applied.
>
>
> Should we also move to pull request model?
>
> This will require some preparation work to be done beforehand for example
> pre commit builds on pull requests will need to be configured. I happen to
> have some experience in this process (I recently did this for Apache
> Falcon) and if everyone agrees to move to this new model then I can
> volunteer for it.
>
>
> Cheers
> Ajay Yadava
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission
> of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its
> receipt.
>

Reply via email to