-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44180/#review122511
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!





lens-ui/app/adapters/AdhocQueryAdapter.js (line 123)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44180/#comment184559>

    Shouldn't we always be using existing methods for constructing full url 
based on base url and query params?


- Rajat Khandelwal


On March 8, 2016, 6:58 p.m., Ankeet Maini wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44180/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 8, 2016, 6:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens, Amareshwari Sriramadasu, Deepak Barr, and Rajat 
> Khandelwal.
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixes LENS UI module after API contracts change.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-ui/app/actions/AdhocQueryActions.js 284c781 
>   lens-ui/app/adapters/AdhocQueryAdapter.js 376068b 
>   lens-ui/app/adapters/BaseAdapter.js 634b974 
>   lens-ui/app/components/CubeSchemaComponent.js c56cb15 
>   lens-ui/app/components/QueryDetailResultComponent.js 096adde 
>   lens-ui/app/components/QueryParamRowComponent.js 89c8a8e 
>   lens-ui/app/components/TableSchemaComponent.js 7abab95 
>   lens-ui/app/components/TableTreeComponent.js 799dc9f 
>   lens-ui/app/stores/AdhocQueryStore.js 3f880bf 
>   lens-ui/app/stores/CubeStore.js 09b469f 
>   lens-ui/app/stores/DatabaseStore.js 79894cf 
>   lens-ui/app/stores/SavedQueryStore.js fb2869b 
>   lens-ui/app/stores/TableStore.js 5ef84fa 
>   lens-ui/app/stores/UserStore.js ee5506f 
>   lens-ui/package.json b21302b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44180/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> UI looks good with this. Saved Query module needs to be tested, along with 
> in-memory result mode. This diff is w.r.t to current-release-line branch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ankeet Maini
> 
>

Reply via email to