> On Aug. 5, 2016, 9:30 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/SchedulerEventListener.java,
> >  line 88
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50814/diff/1/?file=1463268#file1463268line88>
> >
> >     This would require changes in specs. 
> >     
> >     ```<xs:element type="xs:string" name="resource_path" minOccurs="0" 
> > maxOccurs="unbounded">
> >                     <xs:annotation>
> >                         <xs:documentation>
> >                             Path for resources like jars etc. e.g. 
> > /path/to/my/jar
> >                         </xs:documentation>
> >                     </xs:annotation>
> >                 </xs:element>
> >     ```
> >     
> >     Followed by changes in test cases, regression tests and clients using 
> > the REST API. 
> >     
> >     So either let's make those changes right now to minimize trickle down 
> > effect, or let's decide that we'll infer type from the file's extension.

Yeah. It's easy to do right now.


> On Aug. 5, 2016, 9:30 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/ScheduleResource.java,
> >  lines 216-218
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50814/diff/1/?file=1463266#file1463266line216>
> >
> >     Shouldn't be needed. `GenericExceptionMapper` will take care to ruturn 
> > the correct `APIResult`. Can you verify through test cases?

I am thinking to fix all the API things in separate JIRA. Lots of message 
formatting has to be done.


> On Aug. 5, 2016, 9:30 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/ScheduleResource.java,
> >  lines 156-183
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50814/diff/1/?file=1463266#file1463266line156>
> >
> >     Can we add documentations for all these functions so that they can be 
> > reflected in http://lens.apache.org/resource_ScheduleResource.html

Yes. We will do. Just after bug fixes.


- Lavkesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50814/#review144898
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 4, 2016, 6:10 p.m., Lavkesh Lahngir wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50814/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 4, 2016, 6:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1265
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1265
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 1. Scheduler's submit job is not setting db and session config passed
> 2. Scheduler's getJobDefinition api is giving response status 500
> 3. Instance run result path is set NULL in job_instance_run_table
> 4. Delete on scheduler job is failing with NPE
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInfo.java 
> b19248f 
>   
> lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInstanceInfo.java
>  52b56ca 
>   
> lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInstanceRun.java
>  e6c1571 
>   
> lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInstanceState.java
>  93d3d7e 
>   lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobState.java 
> ffaae6c 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/AlarmService.java 
> 217879f 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/ScheduleResource.java
>  8603edf 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/SchedulerDAO.java 
> 7a2b06a 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/SchedulerEventListener.java
>  7323add 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/SchedulerQueryEventListener.java
>  5b12720 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/scheduler/SchedulerServiceImpl.java
>  14ca32d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50814/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lavkesh Lahngir
> 
>

Reply via email to