We should not be calling LENS-959 (is only testcase changes) , LENS-950 (is more a bug fix), LENS-1191 ( a new feature), LENS-771 ( is a bug fix) and LENS-1159 (is a bug fix).
More to be labeled as incompatible changes : LENS-1217 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1217> Remove old java ui server <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1217> LENS-1212 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1212> Enable saved queries by default <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1212> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Following list of issues seem like potential incompatibilities (wrt to lens > server upgrade, lens db upgrade ). Will share a more pruned list (after > more analysis). > Please feel free to add more issues to this list of *incompatible > issues*. (Complete > list is available here > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > 3D%20LENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC> > ) > > Sub-task LENS-988 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-988> > LENS-124 > [Server] StateStore for LensScheduler Lavkesh Lahngir Ajay Yadava Major > Closed Fixed 3/13/16 18:44 8/18/16 9:15 2.6 server > Wish LENS-518 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-518> Move Hive > dependency to Apache Hive Rajat Khandelwal Amareshwari Sriramadasu Major > Closed Fixed 4/22/15 8:37 8/18/16 9:21 2.6 build > Improvement LENS-919 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-919> > Persist > Query Priority in Lens DB Puneet Gupta Puneet Gupta Minor Closed Fixed > 1/12/16 > 9:49 8/18/16 11:42 2.6 server > New Feature LENS-833 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-833> > Limit > number of open sessions per user on session service Raju Bairishetti > Amareshwari > Sriramadasu Major Closed Fixed 10/19/15 10:12 8/18/16 12:39 2.6 server > Task LENS-959 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-959> remove > cube keyword from all test cases of lens-cube Rajat Khandelwal Rajat > Khandelwal Major Closed Fixed 2/16/16 11:03 8/18/16 14:38 2.6 cube > Task LENS-1244 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1244> Mark > 2.6.x release as GA and remove beta Puneet Gupta Puneet Gupta Blocker > Closed > Fixed 7/31/16 3:02 8/19/16 8:12 2.6 build > Sub-task LENS-1186 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1186> > LENS-1179 > Refactor exception handling in QueryServiceResource Rajat Khandelwal Rajat > Khandelwal Major Resolved Fixed 6/15/16 8:13 6/22/16 9:13 2.6 > Improvement LENS-950 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-950> > Bridge > table join should ignore join type config Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Amareshwari > Sriramadasu Major Resolved Fixed 2/9/16 10:47 2/15/16 15:16 2.6 > Improvement LENS-909 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-909> We > should avoid sending email notification with inmemory results Puneet > Gupta Amareshwari > Sriramadasu Major Resolved Fixed 12/22/15 23:03 2/7/16 10:47 2.6 server > Task LENS-1198 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1198> Update > hive dependency to apache hive 2.1.0 Rajat Khandelwal Amareshwari > Sriramadasu Critical Resolved Fixed 6/22/16 4:02 7/24/16 4:27 2.6 build > Bug LENS-1215 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1215> Move > cluster user determination to cli from client Rajat Khandelwal Rajat > Khandelwal Major Resolved Fixed 7/14/16 12:12 7/19/16 12:55 2.6 > New Feature LENS-1191 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1191> > Lens > Python client should support half sync half async model of execution Rajat > Khandelwal Puneet Gupta Major Resolved Fixed 6/17/16 3:27 7/27/16 9:39 > 2.6 > > Sub-task LENS-1187 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1187> > LENS-1179 > Refactor exception handling in MetastoreResource Rajat Khandelwal Rajat > Khandelwal Major Resolved Fixed 6/15/16 8:13 7/1/16 11:08 2.6 > Bug LENS-1159 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1159> Lens > session is adding HIVE_HOME/lib/* to class path Rajat Khandelwal Rajat > Khandelwal Major Resolved Fixed 5/27/16 11:14 5/31/16 15:51 2.6 > Bug LENS-1029 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1029> > lens-server-snapshotter > died in one of the scenarios Puneet Gupta Amareshwari Sriramadasu Critical > Resolved Fixed 5/3/16 9:03 5/9/16 12:15 2.6 server > Improvement LENS-1013 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1013> DriverQueryHook > should support postSelect option also. Puneet Gupta Puneet Gupta Major > Resolved Fixed 4/21/16 11:58 4/28/16 5:08 2.6 server > Bug LENS-771 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-771> Multiple > chain ref columns having subset chains are not pruned properly Amareshwari > Sriramadasu Amareshwari Sriramadasu Major Resolved Fixed 9/10/15 4:59 > 5/12/16 > 8:01 > > > *********Summary or Lens 2.6 so far ************ > > Status Count > Closed 71 > Open 7 > Resolved 93 > > Grand Total 171 > About 37 (out of 171) are Test/Regression related Issues > 7 Open Issues are mostly pertaining to documentation/test . May go in or > may not as they may not require QA verification > > > Thanks, > Puneet Gupta > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Branching is done for Lens 2.6.0 > > > > > > Thanks, > > Puneet Gupta > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Rajat Khandelwal < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Let's also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1178 in the > >> release. > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Will start the merge once LENS-128, LENS-1168, LENS-996, LENS-1202, > >> > LENS-1217 are in . > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Puneet Gupta > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Puneet Gupta < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi > >> > > > >> > > Waiting for a few important fixes to go in . Will merge master into > >> > > release branch post that ( targeting 22 July) > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Puneet Gupta > >> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:56 PM, amareshwarisr . < > >> [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Release plan looks great! > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Puneet Gupta < > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > We have some significant improvements and features added after > 2.5 > >> > >> > release, mainly : > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Hive 2 support and move Hive dependency to Apache Hive > >> > >> > - Lens Regression module added > >> > >> > - Work on Lens Scheduler is 70% complete. > >> > >> > - Limit number of open sessions per user on session service > >> > >> > - Enable streaming results for queries > >> > >> > - cube-segmentation specification added > >> > >> > - Python client support > >> > >> > - Exponential back off for hive queries > >> > >> > - Client result set iterable api added > >> > >> > - Lens UI enhancements > >> > >> > - Query Priority persisted in Lens DB > >> > >> > - Option to kill queries that exceed timeout added > >> > >> > - Convert dimension filter to fact filters for performance > >> improvement > >> > >> > - Return same handle for repeated query from same user > >> > >> > - Post select option added to DriverQueryHook > >> > >> > - Skip partition registration for very old and future dates for a > >> fact > >> > >> > tables > >> > >> > - Weighted Driver selector added. > >> > >> > - Cube keyword made optional in queries > >> > >> > - Session close will not result in queued query failures > >> > >> > > >> > >> > and bug fixes. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I'm volunteering to manage the release. Calling out for a release > >> > >> > preparation for 2.6 here. > >> > >> > *Unassigned open items on 2.6 are ( A total of 13 issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20L > >> ENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20resolution%20% > >> 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Contributors are welcome to provide fix for those issues. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > *All the open issues (A total of 30 issues including above > >> mentioned > >> > >> > 13 unassigned issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20L > >> ENS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% > 20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > *Issues yet to verify (A total of 107 issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20L > >> ENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved > >> > >> > > >> > >> > If any of you feel your changes should go into 2.6 and the jira > is > >> not > >> > >> > marked with fix version, please do so. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Putting down the plan for 2.6 release: > >> > >> > - Will merge master into release branch after two weeks from > >> now. > >> > >> > We can resolve the open issues until then. > >> > >> > (18/July/2016) > >> > >> > - We will spend one-two weeks to fix blockers on the release > >> branch > >> > >> > if any and verify release candidate and roll release candidates > >> until > >> > >> > a release vote passes(29/July/2016) > >> > >> > - Will roll release candidate on 3/Aug/2016 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Let me know your concerns/comments. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > Puneet Gupta > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Branching is done for Lens 2.6.0 > > > > > > Thanks, > > Puneet Gupta > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Rajat Khandelwal < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Let's also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1178 in the > >> release. > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Will start the merge once LENS-128, LENS-1168, LENS-996, LENS-1202, > >> > LENS-1217 are in . > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Puneet Gupta > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Puneet Gupta < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi > >> > > > >> > > Waiting for a few important fixes to go in . Will merge master into > >> > > release branch post that ( targeting 22 July) > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Puneet Gupta > >> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:56 PM, amareshwarisr . < > >> [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Release plan looks great! > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Puneet Gupta < > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > We have some significant improvements and features added after > 2.5 > >> > >> > release, mainly : > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Hive 2 support and move Hive dependency to Apache Hive > >> > >> > - Lens Regression module added > >> > >> > - Work on Lens Scheduler is 70% complete. > >> > >> > - Limit number of open sessions per user on session service > >> > >> > - Enable streaming results for queries > >> > >> > - cube-segmentation specification added > >> > >> > - Python client support > >> > >> > - Exponential back off for hive queries > >> > >> > - Client result set iterable api added > >> > >> > - Lens UI enhancements > >> > >> > - Query Priority persisted in Lens DB > >> > >> > - Option to kill queries that exceed timeout added > >> > >> > - Convert dimension filter to fact filters for performance > >> improvement > >> > >> > - Return same handle for repeated query from same user > >> > >> > - Post select option added to DriverQueryHook > >> > >> > - Skip partition registration for very old and future dates for a > >> fact > >> > >> > tables > >> > >> > - Weighted Driver selector added. > >> > >> > - Cube keyword made optional in queries > >> > >> > - Session close will not result in queued query failures > >> > >> > > >> > >> > and bug fixes. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I'm volunteering to manage the release. Calling out for a release > >> > >> > preparation for 2.6 here. > >> > >> > *Unassigned open items on 2.6 are ( A total of 13 issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% > >> 20LENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20resolution% > >> 20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Contributors are welcome to provide fix for those issues. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > *All the open issues (A total of 30 issues including above > >> mentioned > >> > >> > 13 unassigned issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% > >> 20LENS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVer > >> sion%20%3D%202.6 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > *Issues yet to verify (A total of 107 issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% > >> 20LENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved > >> > >> > > >> > >> > If any of you feel your changes should go into 2.6 and the jira > is > >> not > >> > >> > marked with fix version, please do so. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Putting down the plan for 2.6 release: > >> > >> > - Will merge master into release branch after two weeks from > >> now. > >> > >> > We can resolve the open issues until then. > >> > >> > (18/July/2016) > >> > >> > - We will spend one-two weeks to fix blockers on the release > >> branch > >> > >> > if any and verify release candidate and roll release candidates > >> until > >> > >> > a release vote passes(29/July/2016) > >> > >> > - Will roll release candidate on 3/Aug/2016 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Let me know your concerns/comments. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > Puneet Gupta > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Branching is done for Lens 2.6.0 > > > > > > Thanks, > > Puneet Gupta > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Rajat Khandelwal < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Let's also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1178 in the > >> release. > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Will start the merge once LENS-128, LENS-1168, LENS-996, LENS-1202, > >> > LENS-1217 are in . > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Puneet Gupta > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Puneet Gupta < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi > >> > > > >> > > Waiting for a few important fixes to go in . Will merge master into > >> > > release branch post that ( targeting 22 July) > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Puneet Gupta > >> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:56 PM, amareshwarisr . < > >> [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Release plan looks great! > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Puneet Gupta < > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > We have some significant improvements and features added after > 2.5 > >> > >> > release, mainly : > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Hive 2 support and move Hive dependency to Apache Hive > >> > >> > - Lens Regression module added > >> > >> > - Work on Lens Scheduler is 70% complete. > >> > >> > - Limit number of open sessions per user on session service > >> > >> > - Enable streaming results for queries > >> > >> > - cube-segmentation specification added > >> > >> > - Python client support > >> > >> > - Exponential back off for hive queries > >> > >> > - Client result set iterable api added > >> > >> > - Lens UI enhancements > >> > >> > - Query Priority persisted in Lens DB > >> > >> > - Option to kill queries that exceed timeout added > >> > >> > - Convert dimension filter to fact filters for performance > >> improvement > >> > >> > - Return same handle for repeated query from same user > >> > >> > - Post select option added to DriverQueryHook > >> > >> > - Skip partition registration for very old and future dates for a > >> fact > >> > >> > tables > >> > >> > - Weighted Driver selector added. > >> > >> > - Cube keyword made optional in queries > >> > >> > - Session close will not result in queued query failures > >> > >> > > >> > >> > and bug fixes. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I'm volunteering to manage the release. Calling out for a release > >> > >> > preparation for 2.6 here. > >> > >> > *Unassigned open items on 2.6 are ( A total of 13 issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > >> 3D%20LENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20resolution%20%3D% > >> 20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Contributors are welcome to provide fix for those issues. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > *All the open issues (A total of 30 issues including above > >> mentioned > >> > >> > 13 unassigned issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > >> 3D%20LENS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% > >> 20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > *Issues yet to verify (A total of 107 issues)* > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > >> 3D%20LENS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6%20AND%20status%20% > 3D%20Resolved > >> > >> > > >> > >> > If any of you feel your changes should go into 2.6 and the jira > is > >> not > >> > >> > marked with fix version, please do so. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Putting down the plan for 2.6 release: > >> > >> > - Will merge master into release branch after two weeks from > >> now. > >> > >> > We can resolve the open issues until then. > >> > >> > (18/July/2016) > >> > >> > - We will spend one-two weeks to fix blockers on the release > >> branch > >> > >> > if any and verify release candidate and roll release candidates > >> until > >> > >> > a release vote passes(29/July/2016) > >> > >> > - Will roll release candidate on 3/Aug/2016 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Let me know your concerns/comments. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________ > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its > receipt. >
