Hi Archana/Divakar,
  LENS-1437, LENS-1439, LENS-1443, LENS-1446 and LENS1451 were already part
of current-release-line.

 I have just merged remaining commits from the previous email to
current-release-line branch.

@Divarkar, Please pick up the latest jar for testing.

Thanks,
Raju


On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Raju Bairishetti <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>    I am planning to add the following commits from master branch to
> current-release-line branch.
>
> Bug fixes  for VirtualFacts:
>     LENS-1443: Fallback ranges not working for virtual facts
>     LENS-1437 : Missing unit test cases for virtual fact
>     LENS-1446: Cube latestdate api broken after virtual fact
>     LENS-1463 : Valid Columns addition in Virtual Fact
>     LENS-1473: Cubevirtualfact table relative start time has incorrect
> config field name
>
> Cube Segmentation:
>     LENS-1474 : Fix NPE in ExpressionResolver for SegmentationCandidate
>     LENS-1475 : Override equals(Object obj) and hashcode() methods of
> SegmentationCandidate
>     LENS-1439: Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a
> segmentation containing single segment
>     LENS-1451: Enforcing valid fact tables doesn't filter out segmentations
>
> Other bug fixes:
>     LENS-1464: One or two queued queries failing with
> ConcurrentModificationException on restart
>      LENS-1467: CubeQueryContext.getAllFilters is returning incorrect list
> of filters in case there is an "OR" in the filters
>     LENS-1465: Sync queries blocking threads
>      LENS-1468: Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten
> properly for join queries
>
>
>  Please let me know if you want to include any specific commits to release
> branch.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Raju
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Raju Bairishetti <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Archana,
>>    Thanks for the detailed update and suggestion.
>>
>> Sure, we can add bug fix commits to the release branch. I will update
>> here once I am merging the bug fix commits into the release branch.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:55 PM, archana h <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raju,
>>> Divakar couldn't pick up this as he was busy with internal releases. He
>>> will be resuming on this today.
>>> Of late some bug fixes have gone into master, shall we cherry pick and
>>> commit those to current-release-line branch?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Raju Bairishetti <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Divakar,
>>> >    Can you try to complete the release testing by the end of this week?
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Raju Bairishetti <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Divakar,
>>> > >    How is the release testing going on?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:53 PM, archana h <[email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi Raju,
>>> > >> Around 60% testing is been complete. A new person (Divakar) from our
>>> > team
>>> > >> is working on the verification of this release.
>>> > >> One more week effort is pending which will tentatively be completed
>>> by
>>> > >> this
>>> > >> month end.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Raju Bairishetti <[email protected]>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Hi Archana,
>>> > >> >     Can you please let us know the status of release verification?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM, archana h <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > Yes planning to complete by july end.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Raju Bairishetti <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > Release verification is still in progress. Expecting the
>>> > >> verification
>>> > >> > of
>>> > >> > > > release to be completed by end of July.
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >  @Archana, Can you please confirm from your side?
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:49 PM, amareshwarisr . <
>>> > >> > [email protected]>
>>> > >> > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > > Do we have any realistic dates now for the release? Raju and
>>> > >> Archana,
>>> > >> > > Can
>>> > >> > > > > you help?
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Raju Bairishetti <
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Hi All,
>>> > >> > > > > >     I am adjusting the release dates as we found a few
>>> bugs in
>>> > >> the
>>> > >> > > > > feature
>>> > >> > > > > > tasks verification.
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Updated release calendar https://cwiki.apache.org/
>>> > >> > > > > confluence/display/LENS/
>>> > >> > > > > > Release+Calendar with new release dates.
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Raju Bairishetti <
>>> > >> [email protected]
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:30 PM, amareshwarisr . <
>>> > >> > > > > [email protected]
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> Raju,
>>> > >> > > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> We would like to get LENS-1412, LENS-981 in 2.7, both
>>> of
>>> > them
>>> > >> > are
>>> > >> > > in
>>> > >> > > > > > under
>>> > >> > > > > > >> review.
>>> > >> > > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > Sure, We can include both LENS-1412 and LENS-981 in 2.7.
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> Can you wait for them to bump up version?
>>> > >> > > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> I have already updated master to 2.8.  But, we can
>>> commit
>>> > >> those
>>> > >> > > > > patches
>>> > >> > > > > > > to both master and current-release-line branch.
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> Thanks
>>> > >> > > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Raju Bairishetti <
>>> > >> > > [email protected]>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > Hi All,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >      I have done branching for 2.7 release. Moved
>>> out a
>>> > >> couple
>>> > >> > > of
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > unresolved issues from 2.7.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>> > >> repos/asf?p=lens.git;a=shortlo
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > g;h=refs/heads/current-release-line
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Raju Bairishetti <
>>> > >> > > > [email protected]>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > Hi All,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >    Just a reminder, we are targeting branching for
>>> 2.7
>>> > >> > release
>>> > >> > > > on
>>> > >> > > > > > 20th
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > May.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Raju Bairishetti <
>>> > >> > > > > [email protected]>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:15 PM, amareshwarisr . <
>>> > >> > > > > > >> [email protected]
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks Raju for the plan. Looks good to me.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> Have moved out few issues from 2.7. Also I see
>>> next
>>> > >> > release
>>> > >> > > as
>>> > >> > > > > > still
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > 2.8,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> not 3.0.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Noted.  Thanks for the correction :)
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> Amareshwari
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Raju
>>> Bairishetti <
>>> > >> > > > > > [email protected]>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > Hi,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >    I am volunteering for managing the next
>>> release.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > We have added some major features and
>>> improvements
>>> > >> after
>>> > >> > > 2.6
>>> > >> > > > > > >> release.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> We
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > have resolved 92 issues after the 2.6.0
>>> release.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > *Major Features & Improvements:*
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Cube segmentation for Base cube
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Support for fact to fact union (Unioning data
>>> > >> across
>>> > >> > > > facts)
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Added a Data completeness checker to know
>>> whether
>>> > >> the
>>> > >> > > > > > registered
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > partition has complete data or not
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Moved Lens development to Java8
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Support for more hooks(pre & post rewrite and
>>> > >> pre/post
>>> > >> > > > > > >> estimate) in
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > DriverQueryHook
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Support Asynchronous status updates from
>>> drivers
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Support for PreparedStatement in Lens JDBC
>>> client
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Send notifications to Http endpoints when the
>>> > >> query is
>>> > >> > > > > > completed
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Added an ability to analyze active sessions
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Optimized measure covering set to exclude
>>> facts
>>> > >> > covering
>>> > >> > > > > > >> measure in
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> other
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > combinations
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Improvements in Scheduler API messages
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Added query failure retries for transient
>>> errors
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Support for creating the schema from CLI
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Allowing start and end times for fact table
>>> > columns
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Persisting Lens conf in finished_queries
>>> table
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Limiting the max number of jobs scheduled per
>>> > user
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * provides detail info about all the queries in
>>> > lens
>>> > >> > > server
>>> > >> > > > > > >> instead
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > of
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> only
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > query handle
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Terminate the long running queries after
>>> timeout
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * Made ResultRow as serializable obj for
>>> analyzing
>>> > >> the
>>> > >> > > > results
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > through
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > spark
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * more improvements and bug fixes
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > We have a total of 31 open issues. Some of the
>>> > issues
>>> > >> > can
>>> > >> > > be
>>> > >> > > > > > >> moved to
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> 3.0
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > if required.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>> > >> /issues/?jql=project%20%
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > 3D%20LENS%20AND%20status%20%
>>> > >> > 3D%20Open%20AND%20resolution%
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > 20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fix
>>> Version%20%3D%202.7
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > * 12 unassigned issues are in 2.7
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>> > >> /issues/?jql=project%20%
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > 3D%20LENS%20AND%20status%20%
>>> > >> > 3D%20Open%20AND%20resolution%
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > 20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fix
>>> Version%20%3D%202.7
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > contributors are welcome to provide a fix for
>>> these
>>> > >> > > issues.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > We have a total of 113 assigned unresolved
>>> issues
>>> > >> which
>>> > >> > > does
>>> > >> > > > > not
>>> > >> > > > > > >> have
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > fix-version. Respective owners, please take a
>>> look
>>> > at
>>> > >> > > these
>>> > >> > > > > and
>>> > >> > > > > > >> move
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > to
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > either 2.7 or 3.0.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>> > >> /issues/?jql=project%20%
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > 3D%20LENS%20AND%20status%20%
>>> > >> > 3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > 20%3D%20EMPTY%20AND%20assignee%20!%3D%20EMPTY
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > Plan for 2.7 release:
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >    20th May: Feature freeze and release
>>> branching
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >    04th June: We can spend a couple of weeks in
>>> > >> > verifying
>>> > >> > > > > > issues.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >    5th-8th June: Dev list voting
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >    9th June: Roll out release candidate
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > Any changes in the timelines will be updated
>>> on the
>>> > >> > > Release
>>> > >> > > > > > >> Calendar
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>>> uence/display/LENS/
>>> > >> > > > > > Release+Calendar
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > Let me know if you have any concerns/comments.
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> --
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> ------
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > --
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > ------
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > --
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > ------
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > > > >> > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > > > > >> >
>>> > >> > > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > --
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > ------
>>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > > > > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > --
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > ------
>>> > >> > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > > > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > --
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > ------
>>> > >> > > > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > > > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > ------
>>> > >> > Thanks,
>>> > >> > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > >> > www.lazada.com
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > >
>>> > > ------
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > > www.lazada.com
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > ------
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Raju Bairishetti,
>>> > www.lazada.com
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------
>> Thanks,
>> Raju Bairishetti,
>> www.lazada.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------
> Thanks,
> Raju Bairishetti,
> www.lazada.com
>



-- 

------
Thanks,
Raju Bairishetti,
www.lazada.com

Reply via email to