> On April 21, 2015, 9:10 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote: > > Just verify by grepping `2.0` whether it's occuring in some place it should > > not. Other than that looks fine. All 2.1 issues summarized in features and > > incompatibilities?
>> Just verify by grepping 2.0 whether it's occuring in some place it should >> not. Yes. Have done that. >> All 2.1 issues summarized in features and incompatibilities? Yes. Have gone through all issues resolved briefly. - Amareshwari ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/#review80929 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 21, 2015, 8:59 a.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 21, 2015, 8:59 a.m.) > > > Review request for lens, Rajat Khandelwal and Srikanth Sundarrajan. > > > Bugs: LENS-505 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-505 > > > Repository: lens > > > Description > ------- > > - Updated download page > - Updated release history table > - Documented incompatible changes in release history page. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/site/apt/releases/download.apt b18b3e5 > src/site/apt/releases/release-history.apt 959ef82 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran mvn site:run locally and verified doc is fine. > > > Thanks, > > Amareshwari Sriramadasu > >
