Jaideep,

could not understand whats the standardization you are mentioning? Can you
give more deails?

Thanks

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Jaideep Dhok <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Can we standardise on using rbt for generating diffs? The same diff that is
> created by rbt to create a review, can also be used with git-apply cleanly.
>
> Thanks,
> Jaideep
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Rajat Khandelwal <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for removing.
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:28 PM Yash Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for removing --no-prefix.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:05 PM, amareshwarisr . <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > As documented at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lens.incubator.apache.org/developer/contribute.html#Generating_patch
> > > > ,
> > > > we said we will use git diff --no-prefix for generating patch and use
> > git
> > > > apply -p0 for applying. Starting this discussion if we want to remove
> > > that
> > > > going forward.
> > > >
> > > > There are two reasons why i think we should remove it.
> > > >
> > > >    1. They are not the default way to generate patch on git.
> > > >    2. Review board is not accepting patches generated with
> --no-prefix
> > to
> > > >    be uploaded.
> > > >
> > > > The only reason we had no-prefix was to not include a/ b/ in the
> paths
> > > > sothat it looks clean.
> > > >
> > > > If people are fine with removing --no-prefix, I can create a follow
> up
> > > jira
> > > > for updating contributor doc.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Amareshwari
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -
> Jaideep Dhok
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission
> of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its
> receipt.
>

Reply via email to