> On June 22, 2015, 6:20 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/util/ScannedPaths.java, 
> > line 95
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35589/diff/2/?file=989047#file989047line95>
> >
> >     Don't need to have return values for functions `removeDirs`, 
> > `filterByJarType`. They are taking a collection and modifying itself.

Earlier removeDirs was working on an unmodifiable list so was returning a new 
copy of the filtered list. Now have merged both and removed dependency on 
unmodifiable list. No return values now.


> On June 22, 2015, 6:20 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/util/ScannedPaths.java, 
> > line 46
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35589/diff/2/?file=989047#file989047line46>
> >
> >     parent_dir
> >                     |
> >                     |__  a_dir
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_1
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_2
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_order(*1\n*2)
> >                     |
> >                     |__  b_dir
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_3
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_4
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  glob_order(*4\n*3)
> >                     |
> >                     |__  c_dir
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_5
> >                     |      |
> >                     |      |__  jar_6
> >                     |
> >                     |__  jar_order(a*\nb*\nc*)
> >     
> >     
> >             new ScannedPaths("parent_*")
> >     
> >     
> >     
> >     Will this work?
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
>     parent_dir
>       |
>       |__  a_dir
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_1
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_2
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_order(*1\n*2)
>       |
>       |__  b_dir
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_3
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_4
>       |      |
>       |      |__  glob_order(*4\n*3)
>       |
>       |__  c_dir
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_5
>       |      |
>       |      |__  jar_6
>       |
>       |__  jar_order(a*\nb*\nc*)
>     
>     
>     new ScannedPaths("parent_*")
>     
>     
>     (markdown causing problems)

Added new testcase for checcking coverage of the scenario.


- Yash


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35589/#review88735
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 22, 2015, 11:31 a.m., Yash Sharma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35589/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 22, 2015, 11:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add jar should be able to take regex path and should be able to add multiple 
> jars.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-513
> 
> New review comments for reopened jira.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/util/ScannedPaths.java 
> ac773fe 
>   lens-server/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/server/util/TestScannedPaths.java 
> 5073634 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35589/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yash Sharma
> 
>

Reply via email to