-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36598/#review92228
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/site/apt/developer/commit.apt (line 72)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36598/#comment146270>

    can we correct the typo here? `should be`


- Rajat Khandelwal


On July 19, 2015, 4:31 p.m., Yash Sharma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36598/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 19, 2015, 4:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Minor fix for Lens website doc fix.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-673
> 
> The lens committer's page (1) still shows the old way of applying patch. 
> Bringing it in sync with the standard style as describe in contributor's page 
> (2).
> 
> git apply --check lens_patch.patch
> git apply lens_patch.patch
> 
> 1. https://lens.incubator.apache.org/developer/commit.html#Commit
> 2. 
> https://lens.incubator.apache.org/developer/contribute.html#Applying_a_patch
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/site/apt/developer/commit.apt 04abc62 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36598/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yash Sharma
> 
>

Reply via email to