J. Wolfgang Kaltz wrote:
IMO we should have more alpha releases. The beta release is something
that could become a production release, if it contains no blockers. How
about
1.4alpha1 8.6.2005
1.4alpha2 8.7.2005
1.4alpha3 8.8.2005
1.4beta1 8.9.2005 (if no known blockers at that time)
1.4.0 8.10.2005 if no known blockers, otherwise it's 1.4beta2
+1 with the option of skipping the last release if we feel we have the
quality already. it really boils down to exposing 1.4 to as much testing
as possible. my gut feeling is that a lot of people won't even bother
with alpha releases, and will sit it out for the final release.
these considerations make me wonder whether we should have 3 alpha releases.
WDYT?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
