�hm, sorry, I just did a round trip: edit -> user publish -> user publish -> revisor deactivate -> revisor
...and now the user can edit again. I may not have understood your mail after all. salu2 On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 18:46 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 17:03 +0200, David Podunavac wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Hi David, :) > > ok, I guess from the technical site what you are planing to do should > not be a problem. The only thing IMO is that *published* documents > *should not* be edited when they are *live*. > > E.g. a newspaper will not get edited after it has been published. IMO > your workflow should be: > live->archive->authoring->live > > This workflow is confirm to the content management cycle. > > Anyway the solution you presented is possible but IMO not recommended. > > HTH > thorsten > > > i wonder if there is a way to edit a file once the state is set to > > is_live? To make the file editable is no biggie: simply add another > > transition in workflow.xml (source="live" destination="authoring") > > and set the variable is_live = false; on_stage = false and authoring = true; > > so that lenya can interpret this as a new document so the user will have > > to publish it and so on. > > Will this effect some other part of lenya and might crash or is there > > another solution?? > > > > regards david > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
