J. Wolfgang Kaltz wrote:
Michael Wechner schrieb:
(...)
it seems to me that consensus is being found, because it seems to me
that
I am the only one who wants JCR integration.
As I tried to explain yesterday, we have been following a top-down
approach and have in fact already spent a lot of development time
towards making Lenya compatible with an alternative backend such as
JCR. You might recall, for example, the long discussions concerning
the changes in the document creation API, which were triggered by the
work towards a repository. So not only is that kind of work
non-trivial, but also requires perseverance. So saying you are the
only one interested in JCR work is, quite frankly,
I am not saying I am the only interested in, but the only one voting +1
to insert JCR right now, or did miscount something?
incomprehensible to me. What is true is that I don't have time right
at this moment to continue this work; but having spent quite a bit of
time on actually *working* towards this goal in the Lenya core, it's
quite strange to hear someone claiming they are the only one
interested in it.
I didn't say that
I would really prefer to discuss the issue of JCR integration at a
technical level. If you disagree with the approach followed so far,
please say why, and how exactly you propose to address the issues
raised, at a design+technical level.
see my other emails re blog publication using lenya:// within the sitemap to
actually use the RepositoryLayer universally within Lenya.
Michi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
