On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 14:39 +0200, Felix Röthenbacher wrote: ... > My opinion is, that the jcr block is not of much use for a CMS as it > uses a filesystem model rather than a CMS data model. > > The implementation of access to repository data as a Source is certainly > indicated.
Hmm, wouldn't make it more sense to enhance the JCR Block to fit *as well* the need of a cms? I mean most of us lenya committer has write access to cocoon. Your suggestion are very interesting but I would like to see that going back to cocoon. We would not loose the over-side and still have a JCR block that is able to focus more on the cms usecase. WDYT? salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
