On 2/8/06, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El mié, 08-02-2006 a las 12:37 +0100, J. Wolfgang Kaltz escribió: > > Andreas Hartmann schrieb: > > That's why I favor explicitly having the word "content" in whatever > > terminology we use to describe pieces of content. Thus my proposal a > > while back (http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/ProposalContentModel), where > > "ContentItem" is a piece of content (or ContentNugget, or whatever), and > > a Document is a collection of such pieces. > Ok, for me the above site is awesome and I agree as well on content item > because item = nugget. Nugget is just shorter as "ContentItem", why not > "Item". ;-) The only thing still hurting me is the document. You say "a > Document is a collection of such pieces" so why not call it > "ContentCollection" or "collection"?
That page tries to redefine Document as a Page, then gets really confused when Documents (Pages) can contain multiple Documents (units of Content). One more time: a "Document" is the internal term for "a unit of information formatted as XML". A "Page" is a "response to a request by a visitor formatted as HTML." Visitors never see "Documents". Rewrite that Wiki page using "Page": half the text disappears and it is much easier to understand. solprovider --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
