Thorsten Scherler wrote: > El lun, 04-09-2006 a las 22:15 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier escribió: >> hi everyone! >> >> >> looking at thorsten's ac work i realized that we still have hierarchical >> "storage" for the policies. although we have gotten rid of that for the >> content after the introduction of uuids, we still need to shuffle >> directories around for the ac "repository" whenever a user changes the >> sitetree. > > Yeah, that sucks. My first implementation was a total rewrite of the ac > but I had to drop that since it was too much of an effort. That is why I > extended the ac we had with the method attribute. > >> what's the plan to get rid of that? would it be feasible to integrate >> the url/subtree policies into the sitetree? > > hmm, not sure. How do you mean? Like having the ac stuff within the > sitetree.xml directly or have a sync-able copy of it which contains > exclusively the ac information?
having ac directly in the sitetree.xml. -- "I don't need backups. I need restore!" - Trad. -- Jörn Nettingsmeier, EDV-Administrator Institut für Politikwissenschaft Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Telefon: 0203/379-2736 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
