[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: [...]
>> IMO no error should be thrown since the demo >> contains only out-of-the-box functionality. > > i'd rather we still throw error messsages. Sure, we should throw exceptions when errors occur. What I meant was that in fact no errors should occur (as a desirable state), because there is no custom java code (which could contain bugs). > sometime when i hit a bug in a > heavily modified custom publication i like to be able to double-check it > on zones. granted, i could check out a local pristine copy and try to > reproduce the bug there, but sometimes that's really inconvenient, > especially when travelling. > plus it seems unwise to let zones differ too much from trunk. and a custom > "eat-all" error handler (as opposed to one that copies the error msgs to > some mailing list) is over the line imho. Sorry, this was not what I meant (see above), but I see that my statement was easy to misunderstand. -- Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
