On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 14:27 +0100, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> gang,
> 
> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 release, 
> and further 1.4 / trunk releases.
> 
> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is 
> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18 
> months.


I am sorry that I could not give you feedback when you did the rc. I had
no internet at home and at work I ATM working with other products.

> 
> i see a couple possible scenarios:
> 
> a) we try again with 1.2.5

+1

I volunteer to do the linux testing.

> b) we retire the 1.2 branch

IMO we can talk about it when we have a stable 1.4 version released,
before we cannot retire 1.2.

> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one)
> 

+1

> i think we should do a, followed by b and c.
> 

IMO should be a) c) and then b).

> other ideas, comments?
> 

Thanks Gregor for your continuous efforts to pursue this topic. 

salu2 

> -gregor
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
-- 
thorsten

"Together we stand, divided we fall!" 
Hey you (Pink Floyd)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to