Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb:
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> Jörn,
>>
>> Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb:
>>
>>> the blog publication is a really bad example of cheating users into
>>> believing we can do blogs. i think it should go. all it currently does
>>> is show that neither our sitetree browsing nor our repository access
>>> scales very well.
>>
>> I don't quite understand this - why does the blog publication show
>> particular drawbacks of the sitetree / repository scalability?
> 
> well, maintaining a big blog is a bit of a nightmare. i must confess i
> haven't checked the blog in a while, but i tried to use it seriously a
> few months back, and it would totally collapse when you have a few
> hundred articles in it. especially browsing them was a nuisance. but
> it's probably not really a repository thing... sorry for this off-hand
> remark, it was inaccurate.

Well, maybe it is really a repo problem. It would be great to have
some stress tests in the SVN. Did you add the articles manually, or
do you have a test environment to reproduce the problems?


>>> our content repository is document-centric and allows for
>>> arbitrary xml.
>>> that's good. blog content is simple and belongs in a database.
>>
>> IMO a blog isn't an atypical Lenya application.
>> The major problem I see is that the blog publication contains
>> a lot of complex legacy code. It would be great if we could simplify
>> and modularize it to improve the maintainability.
> 
> we should withdraw the blog from the rc (at least mark it as
> work-in-progress and hide it from the welcome screen) and clean it up
> thoroughly before announcing it as part of a lenya release. the last
> time i checked, it was neither stable nor had the minimum feature set of
> a true blog, and it is certainly not on par with the rest of lenya.

+1

I don't have a good feeling about releasing the blog in its
current state either. I did some testing and bugfixing, but the
amount of bugs which occured somewhat discouraged me.

What do the others think?

-- Andreas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to