Michael Wechner wrote:
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
as nice as neutron seems, it does ring a warning bell that there are
no other implementations on the horizon. i don't mean to disrespect
the effort, but as it is now, it's just another single-vendor standard...
I don't think it's a single-vendor standard. Yes, it's hosted at
http://neutron.wyona.org, but it hasn't anything specific to Wyona
products.
i did not mean to imply you are trying to push stuff that would bring
unfair advantage to wyona or something. it's just that the standard
originates with one vendor, and that you will have to face NIH syndrome
when going for wider adoption.
that said, i'm all for integrating a complete neutron implementation
into lenya, but it does not really address the current issue of editor
abstraction.
why not? You mean because not all editors are using Neutron yet?
yes. the current situation is that we need those editors, they don't
need us. so we can ask them to converge on neutron, but if they don't,
we must implement glue layers.
get the tinymce people to add a neutron front-end, and i will be
dancing naked on the streets shouting "michi, you da man!" :)
well, let me try ;-)
/me bites tongue (michi cc:ed me on a letter to the tinymce editor this
morning. looks like our proposed zurich hackathon is going to make the
tabloid headlines... :)
but I think it's important that all of us should
request an abstraction layer from the Editor vendors/communities, whereas
it doesn't have to be Neutron. It can also be WebDAV or APP or whatever,
but it should be standardized.
agreed.
--
jörn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621
if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer
and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line
and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
