On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 09:43 +0100, Michael Wechner wrote: > Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > > > Michael Wechner wrote: > > > >> I do not consider "lazy consensus" as something which we should toy > >> with, but a clear definition for a process. As said I am not sure if > >> we actually defined it clearly. Any pointers are very welcome. > > > > > > http://lenya.apache.org/guidelines.html#decision > > > > if you were familiar with our guidelines it would save everyone a lot > > of time > > > thanks for the pointer. > ... > For > instance I cannot find the definition of "lazy consensus", but only > "lazy approval" for code changes on trunk code.
This is the same. > Also it seems to me that > the subject prefix [VOTE] is missing or is lazy approval not a "vote" > and if so would the timeframe of one week not apply ... Normally lazy consensus (or lazy approval) is used when doing proposals. Using [PROPOSAL] in the subject helps to identify this mails and IMO this is a should be. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
