Michael Ralston schrieb: > On 4/2/07, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > These two methods both use ByteArrayOutputStream to copy the contents >> > of documents. My implementation based on a lenya snapshot from 6 >> > months ago, used Object.clone() to copy the content of a page, and >> > then left it up to the implementation of that content to decide how to >> > best clone its data. What do you think of this approach? >> >> What would be the benefits in comparison with streams? >> I guess you need the input and output streams anyway, or am I >> missing something? >> > > My content implementation has a relational nature. My content does not > have a getOutputStream method, as it is manipulated by a content > specific interface (eg, setName, setDescription etc). My content does > have a getInputStream method for generating content. I build my > content procedurally as a org.w3c.dom.Document and then translate that > into an inputStream.
Would it be very difficult to implement getOutputStream(), converting the stream to a DOM and parsing this to get the relational data? >From the performance POV this is certainly not a good idea, but IMO we have to find a least common denominator for all repo implementations. You can still provide your own DocumentManager if this isn't sufficient. What do the others think? -- Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
