Donat Grimm schrieb:
> Good point!
> 
> This would only make sense if there is a common understanding of what will
> be add within the next 7 days (kind of roadmap). Only in that case we would
> freeze a thing that we know...

We can't, it is the other way round - we will test what we freezed,
so we have "a thing that we know" after the freeze.


> The way you suggest it, we don’t know what we agree on today to be freezed
> within 7 days...

We don't agree on something today, we agree on something when we tested
the freezed version.

-- Andreas

> 
> Cheers
> Donat
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Michael Wechner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2007 09:52
> An: dev@lenya.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [FREEZE-ANNOUNCEMENT] 1.4 Release Candidate 1
> 
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lenya devs,
>>
>> since the vote has passed, the next step will be a code freeze
>> on the trunk.
>>
>> It will start in 7 days:
>>
>>  Tue, April 24, 10:00 AM CEST
>>  
>>
> 
> why not today? What if devs add more code until April 24 which will 
> cause other problems?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Michael
> 
>> For more info, see
>> http://lenya.apache.org/docs/release.html
>>
>> -- Andreas
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to