Donat Grimm schrieb: > Good point! > > This would only make sense if there is a common understanding of what will > be add within the next 7 days (kind of roadmap). Only in that case we would > freeze a thing that we know...
We can't, it is the other way round - we will test what we freezed, so we have "a thing that we know" after the freeze. > The way you suggest it, we don’t know what we agree on today to be freezed > within 7 days... We don't agree on something today, we agree on something when we tested the freezed version. -- Andreas > > Cheers > Donat > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Michael Wechner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2007 09:52 > An: dev@lenya.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [FREEZE-ANNOUNCEMENT] 1.4 Release Candidate 1 > > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> Hi Lenya devs, >> >> since the vote has passed, the next step will be a code freeze >> on the trunk. >> >> It will start in 7 days: >> >> Tue, April 24, 10:00 AM CEST >> >> > > why not today? What if devs add more code until April 24 which will > cause other problems? > > Cheers > > Michael > >> For more info, see >> http://lenya.apache.org/docs/release.html >> >> -- Andreas >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]