Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb: >>> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
[...] >>>> I'd suggest that we remove the externals declaration to avoid >>>> confusion and to keep the tagged version smaller. >>> you mean require users to download 2.1.10 separately? i don't like >>> that... >> >> How should we handle it? Should we include the source tree? >> >> My first thought was to change the svn:externals to the tagged >> version of 2.1.10. But this version includes svn:externals for >> the blocks, so that wouldn't make sense. > > i don't understand... what's the problem with including an external to > the 2.1.10 tagged branch? why should we care about any externals in cocoon? When one checks it out, the Cocoon externals are fetched from the head. Unfortunately SVN doesn't support specifying a revision for externals (AFAIK). -- Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]