Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Richard Frovarp schrieb:
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why does it look for publication.xconf and not publication.xml?
because we haven't renamed that one yet?
i thought about doing it last week, but then i decided against it,
because it would have been really confusing for our beta testers:
"ok, you need to merge the contents of publication.xml into
config/publication.xconf, which has a different format now and was
renamed to config/publication.xml..." :-D
since it's not a functional change but a plain search+replace, we
could do it for RC2...
-1 Yeah, but it is a change on how things work. Testers/users will have
to go through and make more changes to their publication so that it will
be compatible with RC2. Having to change publication files for RC1 was
fine (actually I'm doing it tomorrow). I don't agree with having to
change files for RC2.
What if we do this automatically in the build process?
-- Andreas
That would probably help others. I don't include my publications in the
local.build.properties file. They don't contain any Java code. Also, the
way I'm doing the setup doesn't work with that method either. I'll have
to go in and do the changes by hand, or perhaps write a script.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
