Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb:

> Andreas Hartmann wrote:

[...]

>> 2. Checking the existence of the sources is expensive.
>>
>> For each fallback source resolving, we check the existence in each
>> publication of the hierarchy, up to the core. This is of course quite
>> expensive. We could keep this for the "development" mode, and introduce
>> a "production" mode which caches all locations until the cache is
>> cleared manually.
> 
> isn't fallback cacheable?

BTW, the current fallback sources are not cachable by concept. Since
fallback (with the current syntax) is context sensitive, the same
fallback:// URL returns a different content depending on the publication
it was called from. IMO this is not a good idea at all - another reason
to add the ID of the current publication to the fallback URL.

-- Andreas


-- 
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to