Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Richard Frovarp schrieb: >> Can someone explain to me why the workflow.xml document specifies >> roles that can do certain workflow actions? I'm asking because, isn't >> that the role of the usecase-policies.xml document? > > I see your point, since we have usecase policies the workflow role > conditions might have become somewhat obsolete. > >> usecase-policies.xml let sitemanagers do everything and is based off >> of group. workflow.xml only allows one role to do the action, and well >> is based off of roles. > > Actually both use roles. But a major difference is that the workflow > schema is assigned to resource types, and the usecase policies apply to > all documents regardless of their resource type. > > I also have wondered if it might make sense to reconsider these concepts > and maybe find a more general solution.
good idea. i don't have a really brilliant solution atm, but it would be great to get rid of workflow transition policies altogether and somehow translate them into usecase invocations. i'll take a walk over it... :) -- Jörn Nettingsmeier "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
