https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
--- Comment #9 from Rudolf Korhummel <[email protected]> 2009-03-06 06:57:20 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) > > BouncyCastle uses the MIT license, it is fine to redistribute these libraries. > :-) > > 2) How can we inlcude files depending on the jdk version? > > I guess we could just modify the build script accordingly. I wrote a little > extension which allows to execute build files in modules > ($MODULE_HOME/build.xml) when the module is deployed; maybe this could be > useful here. Or we introduce something generic like > > $MODULE_HOME/java/lib/1.6/ If there are often modules with jdk version dependencies, the generic solution is fine from my POV. If this happens very seldom, I would prefer the modules build file. If a bouncycastle lib made with a lower jdk version works with a higher jdk version (I'll try at the weekend), it would also be possible to use the jdk 1.4. version. WDYT -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
