On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > [email protected] schrieb: > >> up to now, there wasn't much feedback on the 2.2 discussions (apart from > >> Felix' comments). Is anyone else planning to actively participate in the > >> migration to Cocoon 2.2? > >> > >> If not, I'd suggest to stop the migration and revert the SVN (use the > >> 2.0.2 branch as trunk again). > >>...
Not sure, I had a look at the revisions and it would be a pity to lose this work. > > Would it make sence to skip the migration to 2.2 and wait until Cocoon 3 is > > available ? > > IMO this makes sense. Cocoon 2.2 has some nice concepts, but if feels a > bit like a hybrid between Avalon and Spring, and not like the holy grail > yet. Maybe C3 will be more streamlined and pruned of legacy stuff. I share this opinion. I see good concepts but it is not yet the best practice approach. Further the development of 2.2 is a wee bit slower since Grzegorz (who took the lead in the dev) stop working on 2.2. Cocoon 3 is MAYBE the best choice, but IMO it makes sense to keep the trunk based on 2.2. up for a while. It would be very interesting to see how the performance has developed with using cocoon 2.2. IMO Cocoon 3 is far from being stable and recommendable for lenya. > > > Alternatively we can develop useful modules and publications to demonstrate > > the power of lenya to the public. > > That would be very important in any case. The power of cocoon 2.2 lies in the blocks and spring configuration. In your other mail you asked whether it makes sense to drop modules in favor of the block concept and IMO it does. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions> Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
