Hi,

I'm totally agree with yours thoughts migration to 2.2 IMO it will cause
many efforts to not enormous gain.

And what about C3 ? 

Myself I'm ambiguous on this point : 

A/ goods reasons
- spring
- cocoon block
- restfull implementation
- cool stuffs on SAX
- monitoring
- maven
- wiket (that could help for improve the user experience)

B/ bad reasons
- many concepts and things to learn (c3, spring, bloc, maven,...) : not
really bad thing (more and more apache's projects use them), but may
discourage and lost some users/dev
- (?very?) BIG development effort 
- not C3 stable release yet : however, this could be an opportunity to
easily pushing some Cocoon level Lenya's requirements

Don't hesitate to add yours goods and bads, as we can have a C3 for Lenya
benchmark.

One part of my body says : "Hey have to go", one other "Hooo calmos, keep
cool" :) 
WDYT ?

Have a good day.


On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:45:47 +0200, Jürgen Ragaller <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi there
> 
> 
> Am 03.06.2010 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Hartmann:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> 
>> That's my CHF 0.02; maybe someone else has a different view, though.
> 
> Not really ;-) - no, seriously thanks for sharing your thoughts! I fully
> agree that the (jcr)-backend topic is more important than moving to
cocoon
> 2.2.
> 
> What the community interest is concerned, here is my view:
> I think some people were not participating in the effort because of lack
> of interest but rather lack of knowledge about cocoon 2.2. and how to
run
> or understand what you have done so far in the 2.2 branch (at a quite
high
> pace) - that for shure was the case for myself.
> 
> 
> Jürgen
> 
> 
> 
> null-oder-eins GmbH Zürich
> web & graphic design
> 
> www.null-oder-eins.ch
> 
> [email protected]
> Skype: callto://ragaller
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to