Yeah, there are some GSoC projects which could potentially be incorporated in the 1.0.0 release (e.g. new Database as a Service API) and there are other projects which should IMO really start as a sub-project (REST API, CLI tool).
Currently we have two students - one will work on the REST API and the other one will work on the CLI tool. On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Paul Querna <[email protected]> wrote: > It might be interesting to incorporate the GSoC projects into 1.0, so > do a 0.9 in June-ish, and then a 1.0 near the close of GSoC > (September?) > > Thoughts? > > 2012/4/3 Tomaž Muraus <[email protected]>: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I think we have made a lot of progress with adding new features to > > Libcloud, fixing bugs and stabilizing the API in the last year or so and > we > > are really close to the 1.0.0 release now. > > > > Here is a list of things which I want to see fixed / improved before the > > 1.0.0 release: > > > > - deployment functionality and deploy_node method - we have already spent > > quite a lot of time fixing it in the past, but there are still some pain > > points and problems with handling the edge cases > > - documentation improvements - we need to add a lot more examples to the > > documentation > > - support for logging in the RawResponse class so it works with > > LIBCLOUD_DEBUG environment variable > > > > Ideally, 1.0.0 would be released before June :) > > > > Please let us know if there is something else which I'm missing, but it's > > blocking the 1.0.0 release. > > > > Thanks, > > Tomaz >
