Janis, Yes, I agree with that. Also for other languages we need a mechanism to limit the prefix-suffix combinations. The Y/N mechanism is too coarse.
I think, to keep the groups apart separation works fine, like: dazugehÃren/Db dazugehÃren/IXY This makes sure, that the endings generated by the IXY flags do not get paired with the prefixes generated by the b prefix. These combinations would be grammatically nonsense. The other way create prefix classes is the secondary flag in the Hungarian spell checking, described under http://tkltrans.sourceforge.net/tklspell/secflag.htm But I think, it would be good, if Kevin fixed the error with the prefixes first. http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44220 Regards, Eleonora Am Sonntag, 6. MÃrz 2005 20:54 schrieb Jancs: > CitÄju "Kevin B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > > > > dic contains: > > > dazugehÃren/Db > > > dazugehÃren/IXY > > > > This is not allowed for in MySpell. All root words in the dictionary > > must be unique. This is always possible by simply expanding one of the > > two sets of affixes if for some reason they can't be merged into one > > entry just by merging affixes. > > And in the same time, especially in cases when by some disastrous thoght > you decided to use the PFX keys also, munch is giving you some kind of well > organized trash: under some circumstances it decides that the _form_ of the > root word with PFX keys must be presented along with the root word having > full PFX/SFX asset. This often ends with many unnecessary dic entries which > one have to hunt down by grep-ing them out. > > It was described somewhere. But i as a non-linguist can not get the point > of why to PFX is given the same priority as to SFX? May be someone could > give me explanation as Mr. Hendricks is not answering on my questions. > > P.S. I can agree that the aff file of lv_LV is not designed in the way > which corresponds to the MySpell idea, but it works. Here are still > questions, for example - what to do in cases when 3 different root words in > three different declinations are giving the same form. May be re-desing > everything based on the roots of the words and not the root-words which by > my understanding is the basic form of the word, something like courir (Fr, > which with its horrors of grammar can be comapred with Lv). > > Janis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
