On 04:16 Sat 18 Nov , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If not, are there plans to develop something like > > this? It seems like it might be something that > > could be achieved with calls to hunspell, at least > > for those languages which have some morphology > > encoded in an affix file. > > There is a plan. See http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19563
Thanks Laci, that's good news. > It would be fine to add a lightweight stemmer to the > thesaurus code combining rule-based stemming with suggestion > filtering by the dictionary (thesaurus data). ... > Using Hunspell would be better for morphologically complex > languages and for suffixation of the suggested synonyms. Or we need both, > Hunspell, and a probability stemmer with metaphon-like operations > supporting many Irish ortographies at the same time. The Irish hunspell affix file would be more than sufficient - no need for anything probabilistic. So I'll be thrilled if you manage to integrate hunspell into the thesaurus code -- should work perfectly for us! -Kevin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
